User blog comment:Skeith9/Heroic Spirits Speculation/@comment-4572759-20140721234938/@comment-24754018-20140722014022

Ah, discussing such things on the internet 2 hours past midnight, summer holidays really are great~

Anyway, Harry really doesn't compare to Solomon, even before you go to the bother of remaking them in the TM setting. Solomon made that temple, bound demons in the name of god, and was granted great wisdom.

[Possible Harry Potter Spoilers ahead, for those who care to avoid such]:

In Harry's case, though he is (arguably) strong in character, his greatest achievement was to kill someone he had an inherent advantage over, and he was never particularly skilled or knowledgeable as a wizard, even if he went on to become an Auoror (or however you spell it). Harry's protection is specific and his spells either common or specialised to the target. To compare him to Solomon is ridiculous. Heck, Dumbledore and Voldemort don't really compare even.

Plus, time period. Harry is in the 20th century, Solomon much longer ago. Even if Harry were a servant Solomon would be stronger on merit of age.

Yes, I do realise you were probably joking, but I have a spare hour or so before I really get too tired to post, so I decided to refute your suggestion.

As for a Caster stronger than Solomon, I'm sure you could find someone. He might be powerful, but I doubt there is no one that could be written stronger than him.

Also, I suppose it depends on your definition of a "better" Servant. While Solomon may have all sorts of stuff for him, the cost of these things is likely incredibly hard to keep going. I doesn't matter how good a gun is if you can't afford the ammo to fire it. So a weaker servant with more affordable upkeep cost could potentially count as a better Servant or Caster, since not everyone has the prana Solomon needs.

Oh, I might comment more specifiaclly on the Solloman sheet later, I honestly did not read the whoel thing til now.