User blog comment:Skeith9/Heroic Spirits Speculation/@comment-24982278-20140525073101/@comment-1458758-20140526120545

Well in that case I can't really defend Enkidu except in regards to the other characters whose histories have been warped. If you personally feel it's going too far then you're entitled to your opinion.

As for the Lancer and Archer limits, this is again something down solely to opinion. I personally feel that an Archer should at least possess a projectile weapon of some sort, where as GoB to me does just scream of cheating. So if Gilgamesh can get by on that, it really doesn't bother me if Enkidu can create weapons including polearms from his body to qualify as Lancer.

Loli-Jack I think is an interesting spin on it, being an orphaned child who is quite frankly sick in the head, but if there is supposed to be this whole innocence spin on brutal murder, that is more than a little spoiling the idea of the most legendary serial killer in history.

As for the Writer Casters, I'll agree Anderson and Dumas are abberations to a great degree, but Avicebron is like the creator of Kabbalah and Shakespeare's seven year gap is pretty much used to explain his learning of magecraft. So in that respect to me they're more Famous Magus who happen to have been writers than total rule breaking. I won't defend Dumas and Anderson though, they're on their own.