User blog comment:Skeith9/Heroic Spirits Speculation/@comment-5739199-20140507023222/@comment-24754018-20140509132322

Ok, we seem to have established a few things:

- Judas could potentially be written as a servant, as nearly any mythological/historical figure can, assuming a good writer can conceive a proper sheet for them.

- There is some irrational hatred for an idea that would have been finished and never spoken of again, had people not been so dogmatic in their rejection,

- There is some silly idea that type-moon takes ideas from the wiki and that the mere mention of a controversial religious figure will destroy a company,

- People are assuming that religious people are wimps with no ability to enjoy a work that goes against their beliefs (and as religious person, I find your assumption we would hate a series for such a minor slight extremely offensive),

As such, I conclude that there is no need to argue about this stupid little thing anymore.

And for the (hopefully) last time, this is not about Judas himself (I have already said that he likely lacks potential), it is about the right of people to write a servant without being verbally assaulted for such flimsy reasons a potential audience reactions (which by the way, is non-nonsensical, this blog is a fan resource, and a mildly redundant one at that).

If you don't like something but can't come up with a good reason to reject it, then just ignore it. No one is forcing you to read these sort of suggestions.

Or, TLDR: We are supposed to give constructive, not destructive, criticism of other peoples ideas.

And Shawn, those "W" posts are weird, please don't do that again.